http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/29/opinion/sunday/is-algebra-necessary.html?smid=pl-share&_rmoc.semityn.www
In this article, the author, Andrew Hacker, speculates if alegebra should be required for students to graduate high school. Hacker's choice of diction, syntax, and detail creates a well-written argumentive essay.
The diction in this article is wisely chosen and adds to Hacker's persuasive tone and opinion. Readers can see from the diction that Hacker feels very strongly about the algebra's negative impact on the high school drop out rate and gradutation rate of students. For example, "Algebra is an onerous stumbling block for all kinds of students: disadvantaged and affluent, black and white" describes alegebra in a negative light and lets the readers know how Hacker feels about algebra (Hacker, "Is Algebra Necessary?"). Another pejorative comment about algebra is said in, "Mathematics is used as a hoop, a badge, a totem to impress outsiders and elevate a profession’s status" (Hacker, "Is Alebra Necessary?") By comparing math to, in a sense, unimportant objects, Hacker uses these words to show that he thinks math is also irrelevant and unnecessary.
Hacker's use of syntax affects his tone. For instance, "How many college graduates remember what Fermat’s dilemma was all about?" is written as a question (Hacker, "Is Algebra Necessary?"). This question has a slight mocking tone to it, as Hacker is quite sure that not many college graduates actually remember small details of their algebra class. By writing this sentence in a question form, Hacker also creates a personal effect to the reader. The question causes the reader to think if he/she has remembered what Fermat's dilemma was. This personal effect is a very good technique that Hacker uses to persuade readers into agreeing that math is not necessary and important for many people.
The detail in this article is a big part of the argumentive writing techniques that Hacker uses. It provides meaning to his argument. For example, "Instead, it [citizen statistics] would familiarize students with the kinds of numbers that describe and delineate our personal and public lives" describes an alternative to algebra class (Hacker, "Is Algebra Necessary?"). Hacker includes this detail about citizen statistics to tell readers that there is a better way of learning math. By giving an detailed alternative option, Hacker has a better chance of persuading readers to adopt his stance on algebra and follow this alternative option to algebra.
In conclusion, the diction, syntax, and detail that Hacker uses are important techniques to writing an argumentive essay and also impact Hacker's tone and meaning of his article. Readers are able to clearly see Hacker's point of view and can ask themselves if they think also think that algebra is unnecessary.
Great job, Julie! You did a great job analyzing this piece of persuasive writing. Using examples on how the author used DIDLS helped show how everything came together to make a great persuasive essay.
ReplyDeleteNice job, Julie! You did an awesome job supporting your claims with relevant evidence. I think you did an especially good job in discussing syntax. It is clear that the author used sentence structure in his favor. If you were to do anything differently, you might want to think about including one or two more examples to support your essay. Another thing that I noticed about this was you don't have to include the article title when you are citing it, but obviously this is minor and just a time-saving thing. Great job!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI found this article very interesting. You did a very good job identifying the diction, syntax, and detail in the article. When you are imbedding your quotes in the essay, the essay flows a lot more smoothly when you say more than for example or for instance before writing the quote itself. You did a good job of setting up the quote in the sentence before it so I think the essay would be better if you included the quote within the sentence describing the quote. In the fourth paragraph you did a great job introducing the quote in the with the first and second sentence of the paragraph but then you ended the second sentence and just said the quote after saying for example. I also would have added more to the conclusion talking about the authors reason for writing the piece and how using diction, imagery, and details he tailored his writing towards his audience and purpose. These are just little things that could help make the essay better. Overall you did a great job!
ReplyDelete